השפעתה של האסלאם על העולם | הרב דני מילר | הכוזרי | תשפ''ו [7]

Kind: captions Language: en Okay, we were in the middle of discussing Christianity. Let's see what is to be seen in the Gemara here in Tractate Ladin. This is not the main thing, but let's understand what this is about . I'll read it quickly again in a few minutes just to catch up on the sequence. The middle of the fourth is not exactly the middle, but the second part of it, Kuzari said in a speech to Dum and Yishmael, that one of the two desired actions is undoubtedly true. We explained why. What is this no doubt here? Because it actually coincides with the word religion, which deals with the desired act. And why didn't he open the book in a meeting with the Christian and the Muslim according to this? Because naturally, the human soul does not give itself to idols. This is no coincidence, and human history more or less sums up or overlaps and saturates the mental tendencies of man. That's exactly what's happening here. It took time for both the people and the global culture to recover from such an influence. The influence of the people of Israel, as we will see later, is the influence of philosophy, which emerged from a point of connection between idols and religions, and eventually turned to religions, just as the world at a certain point after the destruction of the Temple, we skipped the completion, was in the destruction of the Temple. Just as the world after the destruction of the Temple, the cultural world did not, of course, for the purpose of noting that, although it began with us, we will see in a moment, the cultural world very quickly replaced the appeal to idols with the appeal to religions. We will help here. And so it took a while for him to address them here as well, and therefore he is undoubtedly not addressing the Jews, who are also a religion according to him. We will see later that this definition is lacking, but from his perspective, his way of observing, they would know that this is a third religion. That is what is commonly said to this day, unfortunately, but this is the currency, the common language. Yes, everyone often also has expressions like the three echoes of the three religions in Jerusalem. And one can disagree and be filled with rage over the fact that Jerusalem has become a capital of Christianity, but one can be angry about our definition as an opinion, but the world sees it this way, we cannot console ourselves with it, not at this stage at least. In general, why does n't he appeal to Jews? We said this not only because he sees their bitter fate and therefore has no interest in associating with them, but it also indicates that the act is undesirable in his opinion. He emphasizes it like this, because then they are a question mark that we see later after he appears to be a Muslim, so why does he turn to them at the end? After all, nothing has changed. Yes, they have the whole book at least, say the convert, but the first article is before the conversion and does not abandon it because of this desire for everything from death that they are simply from all those actions and the end of the first article he suddenly remembers this desire, we really read the end, he is different from him, Kiv Kig, we will continue, is it not easy, the wisest of the wise men of Edom asked him for his wisdom and his work said to him, the fundamental point A. I do not see a contradiction, but give points, it appears to me together, also the renewal of creation, also demons bowed to the Creator, oh also the crucifixion, two supposedly two-armed forces of forgiveness, also appear among the Muslims, we will see that there, although in reverse order, it perhaps teaches something about the difference between the religions, where he begins with the Creator, then with the creatures, there is no need to begin with the creatures, but with the Creator, now when he believes in this, it means this thing, not only do I say, I believe that this is how it is, I live these messages, my meeting point with the need to be attached from the infinite attachment, from the recognition that there is a relationship between the creatures and the Creator, that is The creatures are gazes of renewal, the will of an infinite Creator. Yes, if He is infinite, I cling to Him. I cannot escape from it. But if He is infinite and I cling to Him, how can I cling to Him? Apparently, the world gives up distance from the Creator. The world is renewed. And the Creator has no will. What did the philosopher say? Why suddenly the world was renewed? Renewal is not only the intention. It is a new thing. There is a tendency. There is a need in this matter. Renewal because there is renewal. If there is new, there is renewal. So he says. I do not see this as a contradiction. Therefore, I am trying to cling to the Creator. We will move on in a moment. He will explain it. And why do I not have a method here that does not account for coincidences. He created the world in six days. We are familiar with a Christian taking it in his own direction. But the main direction here in this matter is that it is not a coincidence. A philosopher does not count days because it does not interest him in terms of the creation of the world. The Creator is creation, because it is all the hand of coincidences. It has no meaning at all. A summary of a physical, metaphysical process. I do not know, but here it is not a summary, it is a matter of values. Six-day order. He also didn't get into the question of what the number six is. This is seen when we are engaged in a friend. He found it to be a fact. Now I emphasize that in the first person you encounter this immense greatness for the first time. The first brother expresses the divine will. The image is the image of God. The divine trend is first evident in the first man. The material world refers to the living world. The world that speaks. You see this and in fact the first man appeared. The encounter with the Creator in a total simplicity. If the first man had remained, here we have here before our eyes. We see the relationship between the Creator and the creatures. The weakness is that man sinned. Sin spoiled the world. It is not long for this. It seems that from this stage and he will go or so the world accepted it. The world itself met with the first man before preparing for this encounter. Therefore, the sin that is expressed by this is the sin of the first man. According to his method, however he explains it, it is not like the Rambam in the book of the confused. From here on out, the world goes through a process of total reconstruction in order to prepare for the reappearance of the divine will. In other words, to prepare for the reappearance of the second first man. If you want to call it that, he distorts a kind of continuity. I don't want to legitimize it. Continuity. Yes, and therefore we will continue. The first man, in his own image, the whole world is actually the creator of the encounter with the first man and of the image of God. Why does he mention Noah? He mentions It says Adam and Noah need me, no, that's the answer, no, that's a good question. Oh, he mentions him later on. Adam and Noah. Everyone who talks about Adam, please point it out. No, it's not written. Interesting. Well, interesting. Let's see if he brings it up. Yes, Tzi Ben Tabun also says another generation. I don't know. I can understand why. Because later on, he does bring up Noah, but at a more advanced stage. Paragraph 67. What does it say in yours? There's a change in the versions. In the collection. Paragraph 67. Talks about the attitude towards the world. They were July, July, primeval matter. So he ends here. Even those who believe this believe that maybe this is here. Maybe not. Because this world is new. From a known time and the beginning of man, who were in it. Well, what does it say in yours? It says Adam and Eve. Yes, Adam and Eve. [Laughter] Yes, Adam and Eve. Good. Interesting question. He does n't even bring it down. I remembered that there's a difference in the versions. I didn't remember that here. I don't know. I really understand why. Yes, but the friend mentions Noah a lot. Towards us, not towards the Christian philosophers. He had a completely different role with us. He has a central role. Noah. We'll see. Good. It remains in the need for a day. This is all they talk about, a human being, and to whom they all refer, not just a biological structure, but a desert, it is no longer a living being with two legs, it is the continuation of that supreme appearance that we saw in the first man now, and since this is not a coincidence, it is a renewed man, not a coincidence, it is an essential leadership from the beginning, it is like this, that is, the Creator has providence for the ignorant and adherence to the talkers, something that the philosopher will not deal with. There is neither providence nor adhesion. Providence is a fit, we will call it at this stage, we will see later what adhesion is. I understand the desire to turn to Him, the work of God, and also punishment, wrath, and mercy, and speech, and prophecy, fear, and also revelation to us, and devoutness, and He dwells within. They came out of the multitude of the children of Israel. We saw all this from the multitude of people. Forgiveness. The meaning is originally from the children of Israel, a period in the first century, before this, the patriarchs, the first house, of course, the judges, the first problems, even in the second house. We meet that the people of Israel are the desired people, with a desired command. The meaning is that it is not all of this that is chosen, but it is desired in it. The divine will appears if it is chosen. How did it disappear from this story? When did it lose its choice? It is with him that we find the will that and therefore the whole of the matter is like this summary and I emphasize that the whole of the matter is not just a statement of another clause but let's include everything we said in Hebrew everything we said is included in what I am saying now of the matter amen I believe in everything that comes in the Torah and the books of the children of Israel the Christian says gentlemen make no mistake the Muslim does not mention this until the end and the Christian does not mention the New Testament until the end the form of the wording is completely different and it does not read it in the light of the matter it says times everything that comes in the Torah in the books of the children of Israel the Bible there is no doubt understand let this is a historical fact not satisfied with their truth because see all the people of the earth how we called their publication and their persistence and their exile with great faith in the masses yes with great faith sister words without the Bible it is difficult for us to understand everything I am saying and this is why so here I want to add a sentence that will help us with the next sentence because this contradictory reality that opens his words that are said about a world of a creator, a pre-existing world and a world of a renewed world can hardly contain both things together because the pre-existing is infinite This renewal depends on the stage where it is needed and why, actually, when the total, absolute, infinite reality needs things that will express it and things that will express it in a condensed form in matter. The answer is that there is no answer to this. Oh, there is a more logical answer to this. The correct factual answer is that with Adam the first, there was the crisis point, perhaps because he was looking for an interpretation for it. He does not explain why. From here on out, Adam does not deal with the question of defining the connection. He deals with the very existence of the connection, and this is a given reality. After all, the people of Israel for a very long time were a people for whom prophecy was the strong factor in which resides the desires of the Israelites. The world saw the people of Israel, saw our total reality, our full framework of life, and got used to the thought that there is something to talk about clinging to the Creator. Therefore, the Bible is a foundation stone because all of this is the Bible. The Bible is the essence of the clinging of the people of Israel. And in those many years, from the time of Abraham, we will begin until the end of the First Temple, the Second Temple, thousands of years. Those years, the world got used to this clinging thought, to religious thought. Now, anyway, this matter is a chimney for this. It is a chimney for the fact that Adam the first made a mistake. Settlements in them because it stemmed from the immature stage before they recognized it in a factual way before it is a model of Israeli life yes but Israeli life removes the doubts not that they solve the question how do they not deal with this question how does one who meets the people of Israel sees greatness sees infinity sees use there are later expressions of philosophers or there is no eternity he does not talk about it here but let us use it and because of that such a world that lives around the Israeli reality is a world that can only develop it at that stage in which the world internalizes it what is the stage in which the world internalizes it end of the second house yes in their sister and following them uniform what am I saying to ask how it does not contradict the reality that you have right not to ask how it may entangle the human race in questions that actually deal with something that they do not have the peace of mind that this thing really exists. We see the people of Israel, then we see the people of Israel, and this reality is just living all the time, and we don't really deal with the question of why the first man was content with what was the first man content with? Oh, no, the first man, the first man, he really was destroyed. So what was the corruption of the first man? Maybe I don't want to say that because it's not like that, but maybe he didn't translate the word of God into the form that he needed. He immediately did it in an attempt. But no, no, and so on and so on. Yes, now the punishment is according to their system, not according to our system. I'm not one who doesn't oblige between the mixed and the soul of the living who deal with this in detail. Ramban on the Torah and so on. What we deal with is Rabbi Zatza Aluli, Lord of the World. Let's not mix areas, but what I'm saying from our perspective is from our perspective. We'll see later from the perspective of Christianity. Here's the freebie. This original sin perhaps expresses the price of the need to deal with translating things into a mental form and putting them to the test. And this is the sin that brought the world to decline. And supposedly there is a time of creation of the world until the point that the world will be long. To accept this devotional thought, how will it be long? Not because of insights, you need To be new not because of additional comments in A. Tirzhu Beiyan but the fact speaks for itself to ask many questions but here we have here that adherence is the main issue in which prophecy and this cannot be denied their publication and persistence by the way therefore for Christians the Bible is also a cornerstone it is not something else another book yes a give it its special raspgarat Tanakh stories of the Bible I do n't like the word stories we will use it from their point of view everything that brings us together with a very prophetic people like that are happy to deal with it is its time really oh in times past I don't know if I mentioned to you it is for a reason yes maybe yes but once upon a time there was a very not talking about me before that two generations before me I don't know there was no generation two there was no Tanakh it wasn't a problem that there is in every Christian house to smell the mission printing Tanakh but half Tanakh half New Testament yes I mentioned to you you asked what do you do it two this I heard it from a person who lived it because it wasn't very difficult to get books of the Bible so they would take it together its if it is allowed to separate it or not why not because The old days were such that when you sew everything is scattered to the wind, yes and so on and so on, well we are spoiled by them, I only bring this as an example of this, thank God, yes with the Catholics, let's talk about the Catholics and not the Protestants. In the meantime, maybe later on, you will have something to say, you need to understand the language. At least the Bible is screaming. By the way, since he has been practicing, this is the book that was printed many times, my brother, and translated into many languages. Yes, because of the Christians. Yes, there is no book of mine that came out like that. By the way, the first printing was about 500 years ago by Bomargano. This is the Bible that was printed. Then, because of the problems of the short-sighted person, what is called, who knows what it is? People would arrange the engravings, the essence of the pages that are going to be published in the book. Then, due to all the technical circumstances, they divided the division of the chapters into a different division. What is called the Christian division, if you are familiar with it, yes, because the printing is not our division, and it is difficult to change our division, the rabbi, even then, they divided Samuel into two parts, Samuel 1 and Samuel 2, because the printing could not hold all the So many pages, then they said, we will take out Samuel in two traditions, Samuel 1 to Samuel 2. Yes, and when Rabbi Tessot writes in the siddur at the back regarding the difference in the blessing of food between Maggidil and Maggidil, do you know that Maggidil from Maggidil and on Shabbat Maggidil are good days as well? Yes, on Maggidil of course, yes, and there are other days of the week, the question is where to insert the month written. This is not the issue. Now they say Maggids of Din and the cynics claim a pretty old claim, but cynics have always been among the people of Israel. Well, it's not just Rabbi Tessot, those who preceded him. Well, they simply didn't know the acronyms. Why? Because originally it was written in the siddurs of the past. You people, people who like versions like that, go too far. Sometimes, and more than sometimes, originally it was written in parentheses after Maggidil, it was written in Shev Megidil. They made the Shevshabbat Sabbath also good days and all the way through years of evidence around this and other explanations, and this is nonsense. A very simple reason because it's not what they claim. Forgiveness is written in Samuel 2. Samuel 2. It is written in Megidil. Yes, then, words of mourning, because Samuel 2 was the first to divide Samuel into two books. With the invention of printing and the one who brought this custom is the Avodram Rabbi David Abodom who preceded the invention of printing by about 150 years. It is written in Abodom in the order of the laws that the Cynics will be Cynics and we will study the Torah but no we will not fight them because that will not help much but in all and then here comes the explanations of Rabbi Tessotsa that he also knew all the stuff all these studies it did not exactly influence him anyway let's get back to our business here here I remind you we talked about the Bible chapters therefore the Bible for them at least for the Catholics is really a basic book that he says here otherwise without it there is no place for all our theory let's erase more than that so forgiveness stories to the expression of the Bible prove that they are an ethos what is called Belshazzar did not exist and were not created that means there was no reality in which the stickiness was a reality of life was then we have no problems on which to develop therefore Christians are very attached to the truths of the Bible we should say no against us against the researchers who claim that there is no cross-reference between the dates of the Bible and history we will not enter For archaeology, history, we won't get into that now, yes, so that's the matter of the foundation, now onward, in their sisterhood, they contributed to the world, and following them, the next stage, they prepared the world, their role, they are no longer needed because they have no choice, but following them, now, we need a new gospel. Here, man is born again, a cry from God, he comes in a vehicle, in the Tula, from the land of Israel, he gave birth to him. We read this: God is seen hidden, he sees the Son of God in the hidden, he lies down, God is and the Son is holy, and we unite his death and all, and if it seems to him that this happens quickly, we will believe in him, unity, because we talked about it now, why is he among the children of Israel? He will return to them, honor, honor, the meaning is not that he is ugly because of their honor, because of their essence, he could not grow in another nation, only a nation in which the holy becomes the central factor in which he can grow in them. He says this when the divine matter is attached to them, he does not dispute it in the past, it is attached not in its thickness, yes, until it is called the name of the Messiah, and hang it. Yes, the part is interesting, in the Khazars, he has, there is no here in my edition, Ben Timon Abbas with The commentaries below are narrow, nice, all of Judah. ​​This section does not appear. Censorship. We once spoke. Rambam. Tosafot. And it does not appear in the Sages. It appears if you want to see. I just brought it here in the Gemara, but there are others who know. I know. Forgiveness. On page Mag. Sanhedrin. There is good here. There are commentaries. But I added it to the side. In editions that do not have it, there is a blank section here. And the story is in the harvesting of the Omer. It is read quickly so as not to waste time. The Gemara speaks about Cruz coming out before him. Sanhedrin. Mag. A certain man, the son of a certain man, comes out to look at someone who committed a certain offense. And a certain man will collect such and such a thing. And a certain man will hold his hands. Everyone who knows about the right will come and learn about it. Cruz comes out before him. Not in the last few minutes, trying to think if there really is no chance of getting him out. Take him out. It is a metaphorical form. It is a shame to hang him. The Habee said, and we must say what needs to be said. And Kraut comes out before him. Before him, there is nothing of the essence. No, this is the end of the page. And when they discovered the original manuscript in the Genizah in Cairo, they archived many, many, many changes, such as here, page 17. In a few more places, you can vote. On them and this is here its editions for the group put it in and the edition here in the ones we saw not here at least it is in the arrivals and grades aside and there the Gemara says look what was missing found it and it appears in a booklet called the disadvantages of the Shass Those who got to see it today less need it because it is in the editions of the Gemara sweet including Rambam Frankel Chot Melchim also Rambam has a question the Gemara and the condition on the eve of Passover take to the Christian Jesus inherit take to the Christian Jesus yes not the exalted and not the cross is in order and the cross comes out before him in court therefore it is difficult Jesus the Christian pay attention I read no not a prophecy Jesus the Christian Jesus comes out to look at the witchcraft and set and hand Israel and set aside cast out therefore stoning anyone who knows his right should come and learn about him and they did not find his right he took on the eve of Passover yes and danis yes yes they take out do not take out from set out cast out do not take out cross cast out yes he said hola if he really was from set out cast out yes but skips Jesus The Christian was close to the kingdom. They avoided killing him at the first moment or wanted to make sure that he had no right to learn about him. In the end, they killed him. And the Gemara tells us that these five disciples of Jesus are fascinating. Who are they? What did they condemn them to death? Why are they? There is a dialogue between the disciples and Jesus. For example, they call Mattayn to Cain. They created the builders. Thank you. Names are not familiar to us. We are talking about him. Example: He skips something. There is now a dialogue of verses. They speak in hints. Now, I assume that they speak in hints. This is not exactly the story. It sounds as if he came to court. Court. Solve the Bible. They handled it in the Bible. Solve the Bible for them in the Bible. It is beautiful, but it is difficult to immediately understand. This is in his reality. They investigated. Yes, we knew the disciples. And it is not written. What is the story? I will give one example. For example, yes, a trip. The Nazarene. Who is this? The continuation is quite consistent. It is Peter. Why did they claim that he continued his struggle. His name was Paulusantus Matthias. He had five disciples. The Nazarene told them. Pay attention. A branch will kill. And it was written. Netzach will be killed. And it was written. Netzach will be destroyed. I am the continuation. His you are killing me is after they killed Jesus now understand what the verse before this sounds mysterious they said to him it is not true netzer arag dakti and you threw from his body like netzer natve this verse stop telling a story if you took out his body this is the debate that was in Christianity and all this is documented here what is written in the classics is here now where the whole story disappeared let's leave it but from this we teach yes oh from this we learn that Jesus was condemned in the Sanhedrin according to the law of mass and mdich and nitala which according to halacha all the niskalim take a second right Jews never crucified Vedas did not discuss the crucifixion like mo like the well known stories who knows the unpleasant picture ah but what did they claim they claim in our defense we handed him over to be crucified by the Romans yes yes this is not what is written in the Gemara nor in the Rambam nor in the Riel. The Real writes it here. By the way, anyone who tests well from a linguistic perspective will receive a certificate and a letter. What is a celloton? Celts and me? What is this? Prayer. Prayer. So, that's why every time it is written in the Torah that it is a calabash, it is written with a righteous person. crucifixion. yes. That's where it started, probably. Yes, it worked out well. Hanging crucifixion. yes. There are places where it says "hanged," and there are places where it says " crucified." yes. In any case, if the Sanhedrin is already open, it is interesting to bring the version here on page 17 in the Sanhedrin, if it is already then there are also additions that call it that, from which you can glean a lot. I once collected things for my own motivation that I collected. You come across it, then you are slandering it. The Gemara speaks of the fact that in the Sanhedrin, Jesus, giants of Torah, we also know people who are giants of science. Now, the second article of the Real explains where every person sits in the Sanhedrin. It takes a lot of knowledge in 70 languages. It is true that I am talking about this early, but I look at the Gemara. Rabbi Yochanan said on page 17, that no one sits in the Sanhedrin except those who are tall, yes, people who are tall, have a good appearance, have wisdom, and have a good appearance. Maybe this is a hoax. Rashi says tall and bitter, that the punishment is imposed on the people. A. Zeruya is imposed on them. It comes to old age. However, pay attention to those who have sorcery and know in 70 languages. What is a sorcery? Rashi says, I read Rashi to kill sorcerers, sages, with their sorcery, to get out of the hands of the court. A. The image of the exposers. An ordinary person might be afraid. They need those who understand. Now, what is more important for us to discover is that sorcerers who mislead and drive away with their spells, who are we talking about here? Wizards who mislead with spells. The reporter, who are we talking about here? Rashi says, such as the Egyptians. The Egyptians are already past tense in the Gemara, it is okay, you need to study it. Find the classic formulas of the Gemara for what I said. And instead of the Egyptians, I don't see it here, but that doesn't mean Nae does bring the correct version. Instead of the Egyptians, Jesus Christ should have been tried, how should we judge him? We need those who know how to ask him what incited the riot. Without an investigation, it is impossible to discuss. We need to understand this. A person who does not understand the field cannot question the witnesses. In short, his name is in the sands. Those who understand Christianity and that is how they killed them. They despaired. And other sources. If anyone still hesitated, I hope we have been convinced now. So he says, here we go. When I say, "No, I do not need to be ashamed of this," this is when the matter is. I will speak truly. Now, Christians use this. Yes, they show the Messiah and hang him. Pay attention. In fact, the people of Israel have completed their historical role. True. But apart from what he has completed his historical role, it is commanded to rise up in him to punish him. The commandments of the cross are for the minimization. Later, the money is back. The foam is constantly on them and on the mongols. On the Christians, who are they? We will see in a little while. And the desire for individuals is on them. Because the Messiah is on them and on their mongols. On the Jews. Forgiveness and the desire are misguided. On the individuals who follow the Messiah, five of his disciples and the castaways. We will see in a little while. And then the nations follow these individuals. We are from them. A later stage and if we are not factually among the Israelites, we are Romans, no matter what we see, we are called Israelites because we follow the words of Messiah Jesus and his friends among the Israelites, who are the basis for the continuation of the 12 instead of the tribes and Mary went later. Later, the Israelites said, after there were 12 of these and for leaven, what is this compared to the Christians compared to the coming, we see above the Israelites, and therefore we had the heroism and power in the lands of the cross, the pilgrims, the conquests, and what not? You will see his argument here, in the end, and here, and this matter needs to be emphasized very much. The first Christians were Jews, and this is why you will see the Christians, really, a very involuntary argument that there is such a concept called religion. Now, in order for it to work, I say this intentionally, because only in this way can we understand his argument in paragraph 5. This is exactly what he is dealing with now. In order to dispel the concept of religion in the human consciousness, we need to free ourselves a little from the suffocating yoke of the idolatry that very, very much grips the person. There is always a sense of doing something with the idolatry, something very real, a lot of emotion, and how do we disconnect the world from the idolatry and bring them together with it? The religion of Teshuvah is the Hana. This is an almost impossible process, but it was true because the first ones were Jews. The religion of Christianity began with the Jews, and not a few of their brothers followed. This is a historical question until when we will see immediately. This is what he says with many of the Israelites. Your power as an example to illustrate this is the Gemara in the Sanhedrin. Also, there is a section called Midrash on Korah that is not always understood. What is written there, such as a discussion of where Korah is buried. One teacher says, "I was in the grave. They do n't know where he is buried. I say, "What did I visit?" A discussion of how old Korah was when he died. How do you know that? And another famous parable. You probably know it. Always bring it up like this. It is the power of demagoguery. That widow who came to Shem, who led the people of Israel in the desert. About Korah. I am talking about. She said to them, "I inherited such and such a dunam and I have such and such children. And I deduct from it tithes and a tenth that happened. And a tenth, two tenths. I and the seventh do not work. It is a catastrophe. There is nothing left for anything and everyone was proud of their lives. Show how much Torah, how much." Your teachings, the explanations of the Torah of Moses, are difficult, so they always bring it up as the power of demagogy, because you say the same thing in a different way. It's different. What credit did I get for giving tithes in a familiar order? But I'll ask a different question. In the desert, there were tithes as contributions to the Ked, which the seventh chapter called the division of the land. What divided the dunes of Sinai? What is this about ? Let's take the question, this article. Another article about Korach. What is she doing? The Gemara asks what Korah did in Israel. Rashi says, forest clearings. Lots of empty areas without trees. The expression "out of 60 men, 250 men" is a joke. It's not a clearing of a hand, it's a clearing of a tree, relatively proportional. Yes. The answer is given in the name of the gerah that everything Chazal says about Korach is actually about Yeshua because of censorship it needs to be with Korach. It's working out great. Check them one by one . Now why is it that the power and Jesus bring us back to Israel, his resurrection? If you are familiar with the paragraph about existence, powers, and reliability. The Rabbi is talking about the power of Cain and the power of Jesus. We won't check that out here now. Therefore, the Rabbi, in his own way, rejoiced over the sacredness. yes. These are not ideas. And the rabbi saw that there too, apparently, but why do I say that? Because Korach, Jesus, did a forced conversion in Israel during the destruction of the Temple. Many immediately converted to Christianity after seeing the Haggadot of the Sages about the catastrophe that occurred during the destruction of the Temple. The Great Revolt. Later, we know what happened there, and people became weak and suddenly it occurred to them that some brilliant Jew came to the Temple and did a conversion. This is also a whole story, and with his charisma and his story, he managed to bring communities together up to a certain point. What is this particular stage? Let's move on. And all the nations, but before that, let's summarize the matter and then we will see this stage unfold and all the nations are called to this faith. All nations are universal, buyers for the entire cultural world. There is no elite choice for them. Yes. And what is actually the essence of adherence? What is a desirable act? We are commanded to adhere to it with this thought and to grow our nation for the Messiah, to recognize the centrality of Jesus and to grow the tree that was taken from him. And I will add a few more things to this. What is the point of growing the tree that was taken from him? On it? Once again a cross for them. But originally it was wood. Yes. This is they made it into a cross of a cross that will be but what is actually in a cross for a thief today and terribly killed him if he is the son of God how did they kill him the answer is true he came out of the grave according to their system the Sermon on the Mount of Jesus which we will see a sentence from which he said according to the dating the eve of Passover he hung him that sermon Sabbath a kind of stone a central point in Christianity in Christian history he said it in Excuse me north of the Sea of ​​Galilee coast on Magor does anyone know there a large plate above the Sea of ​​Galilee condition that where he stood and said it yes no peace the Ministry of Illumination knows translate it to something specific but a anyway Christians come there anyway do we need to take advantage of it or not leave I did not scratch a tear I also do not have a plan anyway ah a to the body of things I say the Sermon on the Mount of the Third was delivered in Sivan to our meninian wait a minute he is already bar minan here the story with the Gemara he is a descendant something now where did he wake up he came out of the grave yes this is exactly the discussion in the Gemara if he Buried or not buried one says what you are talking about is buried is not he is not that name yes they claim now here something happened and as I say you cling to the cross you cling to the shadow cling to the infinity of Jesus and according to them Jesus is alive to this day sitting at the gates of Rome suffering the sins of the world from this developed the whole myth of the confession of the Christians we were Isaiah and the Bible that is said about the people of Israel Khazars article that I bring this Christians claim it was said about Jesus no face was given to him nor glory to him and he was a nameless suffering the sins of the world the corruptions of the world and the question is he and a thin side Jesus forgiveness Second Book and Jeremiah and that Isaiah is the first book how does it work together well the answer is here began the criticism of the Bible there were two Isaiah yes how many more criticism of the Bible began enough on this background and some more backgrounds we were the right of the rabbi equipment on what talks about it anyway so oh yes so this is this matter therefore before and our laws and rules that need to be seen I see that we will see this in a week we will only finish one sentence everything is a desirable act the bottom line what he says here To cling to, to raise and elevate to Christ. Those who live around the Christian idea of ​​Jesus in this, cling to the Creator. To cling to how to raise and elevate to Christ is actually the desired act of living a life of devotion. To believe in Jesus. In Jesus's case, what he commanded us is a number of commandments in quotation marks. They are social. That's why Christians don't do this. According to their system, they have so-called dos, that is, commandments that are actually supposed to elevate all the time. Forgiveness. The feeling of devotion. Art. The meaning is that their church is very well-designed. Organ music. From this, halachic restrictions began with us. The church painter. The classical narrow ones of the Middle Ages were the sorrows of the church. The organists who owed their much later Handel to his face were churchmen. And this created a feeling of exaltation. The Ramban claims an interesting and unfamiliar comment. The Ramban claims in Book 5 that the Hagmol is less familiar. The principles brought it. The principles in the eyes of Rabbi Mari Albo. Even pay attention. It's not clear to us. Maybe we should explain it sometime. The excessive strictness at our house. Knesset in the laws of modesty. What is extra strictness? I mean in a synagogue there is a partition. This is the only place that according to halakhah requires a partition. As for the halakhic issue. Yes. A synagogue that is in a partition does not pray in other places. Maybe yes, maybe not, it does not depend on the situation, but this halakhah claims that one of the reasons we are very strict is because it is a contra antit to Christianity. Christianity saw a religious interest in mixed prayer. They have a proverb about it. It does not explain what it is. I am interested in the matter but I will repeat it again. That is why the people of Israel are so very careful to observe the behavior of the entire churches. No, the form of sitting, forgiveness, not bringing musical instruments into prayer, we will not add more and other things. Yes, in terms of the arrangement of the place of prayer but this is actually the matter that I am returning to is adherence. A desirable act is to adhere to Jesus. Now there are commandments or there are no commandments, if our laws and rules were to happen, it is written in the Evangelion that I did not come to contradict the commandment of the commandments of my children. Israel Gemara on Shabbat the Katz brings this The commandments are practiced We do not have any commandments for Christianity What does he mean here Well because of the shortness of time With God's help Next week if we forget Remind me that we only arrived for a minute and we will move on ‏H